陈旧性树脂表面形态对新旧树脂间粘结强度的影响

›› 2013, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2): 91-94.

陈旧性树脂表面形态对新旧树脂间粘结强度的影响

方加祥,吴锦涛,于金华,张光东

南京医科大学口腔医学研究所

收稿日期:2012-12-20 修回日期:2013-05-20 出版日期:2013-06-25 发布日期:2013-06-26
通讯作者: 张光东 E-mail:edg_zhang@yahoo.com.cn

Study on the surface morphology and bond strength of aged composite resin

Received:2012-12-20 Revised:2013-05-20 Online:2013-06-25 Published:2013-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究陈旧性树脂表面形态学改变以及对新旧树脂间粘结强度的影响。方法：制备Z350纳米树脂样本10例，浸泡于37 ℃蒸馏水中1个月后，使用同种树脂完成样本制备，用体视显微镜和扫描电镜对样本的表面及切面进行形态学观察。万能材料试验机上测定材料的微拉伸强度。结果：陈旧性树脂表面纳米填料颗粒从树脂基质中消失，且新旧树脂间存在间隙，陈旧性树脂修复后微拉伸强度明显降低。结论：新旧树脂界面是导致树脂粘结强度下降的薄弱区。

Abstract: Objective：To determine the change of morphology and micro-tensile strength between fresh and aged composite resin. Methods：After being stored in distilled water at 37 ℃ for a month, ten specimens were used as substrate for the new Z350 composite to adhere to. Specimens were then tested for the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. The surface and incisal surface morphology was analyzed using stereoscopic microscope and scanning electron microscope. Results：μTBS of aged composite resin was significantly lower than that of the fresh resin composite. The nano particles vanished from the resin matrix on the surface of aged composite resin. A rough resin-resin interface appeared between fresh and aged composite resin. Conclusions：The surface of aged composite resin may affect the bond strength between fresh and aged composite resin.

方加祥吴锦涛于金华张光东. 陈旧性树脂表面形态对新旧树脂间粘结强度的影响[J]. , 2013, 4(2): 91-94.

参考文献

[1]Dall'oca S, Papacchini F, Radovic I, et al.Repair potential of a laboratory-processed nano-hybrid resin composite[J].J Oral Sci,2008,50(4):403-412.
[2]Joulaei M, Bahari M, Ahmadi A, et al.Effect of different surface treatments on repair micro-shear bond strength of silica- and zirconia-filled composite resins[J].J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects,2012 ,6(4):131-137.
[3]Bacchi A, Consani RL, Sinhoreti MA, et al.Repair Bond Strength in Aged Methacrylate- and Silorane-based Composites[J].J Adhes Dent,2013,:-.
[4]Hasani Tabatabaei M, Alizade Y, Taalim S.Effect of various surface treatments on repair strength of composite resin[J].J Dent Tums,2004,1( 4):5-11.
[5]Lucena-Martín C, González-López S, Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo JM.The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites[J].J Prosthet Dent,2001,86(5):481-488.
[6]Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B.Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength[J].Clin Oral Investig,2009,13(3):317-323.
[7]Hamanaka I, Shimizu H, Takahashi Y.Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing repair resin to injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins[J].Acta Odontol Scand,2013,:-.
[8]Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ.The repair potential of resin composite materials[J].Dent Mater,2011,27(2):e20-e27.
[9]Spinell T, Schedle A, Watts DC.Polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dimethacrylate resin-cements[J].Dent Mater,2009,25(8):1058-1066.
[10]Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC.Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain[J].Dent Mater,2000,16(4):292-296.
[11]Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, et al.How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling?[J].Dent Mater,2008,24(11):1501-1505.
[12]Ferracane JL, Berge HX.Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol[J].J Dent Res,1995,74(7):1418-1423.
[13]Jones DW, Rizkalla AS, Sutow EJ, et al.Elastic moduli of wet and dry experimental composite materials[J].J Dent Res,1992,71:599-605.
[14]Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E.The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites[J].J Dent,2000,28(6):447-452.
[15]Drummond JL.Cyclic fatigue of composite restorative materials[J].J Oral Rehabil,1989,16(5):509-520.
[16]Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, et al.Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds[J].Oper Dent,2007,32(4):363-371.
[17]Brendeke J, Ozcan M.Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength[J].J Adhes Dent,2007,9(4):399-406.
[18]Mair L, Padipatvuthikul P.Variables related to materials and preparing for bond strength testing irrespective of the test protocol[J].Dent Mater,2010 ,26(2):e17-e23.
[19]Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK.Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers[J].J Dent,2003,31(8):521-525.
[20]Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B.Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding[J].J Dent Res,2009,88(9):817-822.
[21]Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, et al.Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods[J].Dent Mater,2007,23(1):45-50.
[22]Takeshige F, Kawakami Y, Hayashi M, et al.Fatigue behavior of resin composites in aqueous environments[J].Dent Mater,2007,23(7):893-899.
[23]Oshida Y, Hashem A, elSalawy R.Some mechanistic observation on water-deteriorated dental composite resins[J].Biomed Mater Eng,1995,5(2):93-115.
[24]Debnath S, Ranade R, Wunder SL, et al.Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites[J].Dent Mater,2004,20(7):677-686.
[25]Drummond JL.Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials[J].J Dent Res,2008,87(8):710-719.
[26]Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ.Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites[J].Dent Mater,2005,21(12):1150-1157.
[27]Kovarik RE, Ergle JW.Effects of long term aging on fracture toughness of composites[J].J Dent Res,1992,71(2):313-.
[28]Lateef SS, Boateng S, Hartman TJ, et al.GRGDSP peptide-bound silicone membranes withstand mechanical flexing in vitro and display enhanced fibroblast adhesion[J].Biomaterials,2002,23(15):3159-3168.
[29]Liu Q, Ding J, Chambers DE， et al.Filler-coupling agent-matrix interactions in silica/polymethylmethacrylate composites[J].J Biomed Mater Res,2001,57(3):384-393.