后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥抗折性的实验研究

›› 2015, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1): 24-26.

后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥抗折性的实验研究

张昕¹,陈莹莹²,马小青²,张怀勤³

1. 南京医科大学口腔疾病研究江苏省重点实验室，南京医科大学附属口腔医院修复科
2. 南京医科大学口腔医学研究所；南京医科大学附属口腔医院修复科
3. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院修复科

收稿日期:2015-01-19 修回日期:2015-03-11 出版日期:2015-03-25 发布日期:2015-04-08
通讯作者: 张怀勤 E-mail:dentzh@126.com
基金资助:
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Fracture resistance of zirconia 4-unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior dentition

Received:2015-01-19 Revised:2015-03-11 Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-04-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥基底支架的抗折性能。方法：运用CAD/CAM系统设计并制作后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥基底支架，利用一侧第一前磨牙和第二磨牙来修复第二前磨牙和第一磨牙，根据不同基底冠厚度设计分为0.6 mm组和0.7 mm组，每组6个。将所有后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥基底支架粘固于模型上，进行力学加载至断裂。记录所有固定桥的临界载荷，将两组临界载荷数据进行单因素方差分析。结果：两组不同厚度的后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥基底支架临界载荷分别为：0.6 mm组为（1070.5±139.3）N，0.7 mm组为（1217.3±120.5）N，经统计学分析两组临界载荷值无明显差异（P>0.05)。结论：两组后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥基底支架的临界载荷均大于口腔最大咬合力（888 N），抗折性能可靠

Abstract: Objective：The aim of this study was to investigate the fracture resistance of zirconia 4-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) framework in the posterior dentition. Methods：A CAD/CAM system was used to prepare zirconia 4-unit FPDs frameworks with different thickness including 0.6 mm and 0.7 mm.All FDPs were anchored by first premolar and second molar crowns to rehabilitate the second premolar and first molar.The prepared FDPs were cemented on the model using a resin cement. All the FDPs were subjected to load until fracture.One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data.Results：There was no significant difference among the fracture resistance of group 0.6 mm(1070.5±139.3)N and group 0.7 mm(1217.3±120.5)N (P>0.05).Conclusions：The fracture resistance of zirconia 4-unit FPDs framework in the posterior dentition can be reliable. [Key words] Zirconia；4-unit FPDs；Fracture resistance

张昕陈莹莹马小青张怀勤. 后牙四单位氧化锆固定桥抗折性的实验研究[J]. , 2015, 6(1): 24-26.

参考文献

[参考文献]
[1] Anusavice K J. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal–ceramic fixed dental prostheses[J]. Dental Materials, 2012, 28(1): 102-111.
[2] Fonseca R G, Abi-Rached F O, da Silva F S, et al. Effect of Surface and Heat Treatments on the Biaxial Flexural Strength and Phase Transformation of a Y-TZP Ceramic[J]. The journal of adhesive dentistry, 2014, 16(5): 451-458.
[3] Bachhav V C, Aras M A. Zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a clinical review[J]. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany: 1985), 2011, 42(2): 173-182.
[4] Molin M K, Karlsson S L. Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs[J]. The International journal of prosthodontics, 2007, 21(3): 223-227.
[5] Larsson C, Holm L, L?vgren N, et al. Fracture strength of four‐unit Y‐TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in‐vitro study[J]. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2007, 34(9): 702-709.
[6] Aboushelib M N, de Jager N, Kleverlaan C J, et al. Effect of loading method on the fracture mechanics of two layered all-ceramic restorative systems[J]. Dental materials, 2007, 23(8): 952-959.
[7] 苏俭生, 郭凌云, 刘伟才. 两种牙科陶瓷材料层状结构循环疲劳行为的对比研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2007, 25(2): 166-168.
[8] Wang Y, Darvell B W. Failure mode of dental restorative materials under Hertzian indentation[J]. Dental Materials, 2007, 23(10): 1236-1244.
[9] Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer S P, et al. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics[J]. Dental materials, 2004, 20(5): 449-456.
[10] Eraslan O, Sevimay M, Usumez A, et al. Effects of cantilever design and material on stress distribution in fixed partial dentures–a finite element analysis[J]. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2005, 32(4): 273-278.
[11] Zimmer D, Gerds T, Strub J R. [Survival rate of IPS-Empress 2 all-ceramic crowns and bridges: three year's results][J]. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin= Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie= Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia/SSO, 2003, 114(2): 115-119.
[12] Ambré M J, Aschan F, von Steyern P V. Fracture Strength of Yttria‐Stabilized Zirconium‐Dioxide (Y‐TZP) Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs) with Different Abutment Core Thicknesses and Connector Dimensions[J]. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2013, 22(5): 377-382.
[13] Dornhofer R, Arnetzl G V, Koller M, et al. Comparison of the static loading capacity of all-ceramic bridge frameworks in posterior teeth using three hard core materials[J]. International journal of computerized dentistry, 2007, 10(4): 315-328.
[14] Lüthy H, Filser F, Loeffel O, et al. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges[J]. Dental Materials, 2005, 21(10): 930-937.
[15] Raadsheer M C, Van Eijden T, Van Ginkel F C, et al. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude[J]. Journal of dental research, 1999, 78(1): 31-42.