多根牙不同深度即刻种植后牙槽嵴骨形态变化的CBCT研究

口腔生物医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 185-189.

多根牙不同深度即刻种植后牙槽嵴骨形态变化的CBCT研究

钟飞¹,陈宁²,²,顾红政¹,朱镇¹,江烨¹

1. 镇江市口腔医院
2. 南京医科大学口腔医学院

收稿日期:2021-05-06 修回日期:2021-08-04 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-09-27
通讯作者: 钟飞 E-mail:zhongfei362121@163.com
基金资助:
2020年度镇江市社会发展指导性科技计划项目

Clinical Study of Alveolar Ridge Bone Morphology after Immediate Implantation of Multiple Rooted Teeth by CBCT

Received:2021-05-06 Revised:2021-08-04 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-09-27
Contact: Fei ZHONG E-mail:zhongfei362121@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究多根牙不同植入深度即刻种植手术后受植区的牙槽骨形态的变化。方法：选取过往即刻种植的病例38例，共44颗牙，根据种植体颈部颈缘高度分为骨下0、1、2、3 mm共4组，均从根间隔以不同的种植体植入深度植入并植骨。调取术后即刻和术后6月的锥形束CT数据，重建受植区的三维影像，测量受植区牙槽骨宽度（5个平面）、植体唇颊侧（4个平面）和舌腭侧骨壁宽度（4个平面），统计学分析多根牙即刻种植后受植区牙槽骨的形态变化。结果：术后即刻与术后6月相比，多根牙受植区牙槽骨宽度减少量5个平面分别为（1.158±0.567）、（0.676±0.390）、（0.391±0.257）、（0.163±0.149）、（0.053±0.083）mm（P<0.01)，种植体颊侧骨壁宽度减少量4个平面分别为（0.701±0.382）、（0.436±0.274）、（0.274±0.178）、（0.121±0.115）mm（P<0.01)，种植体舌侧骨壁宽度减少量4个平面分别为（0.448±0.308）、（0.233±0.170）、（0.119±0.119）、（0.041±0.056）mm（P<0.01）。在相同的测量平面内不同深度的植入骨吸收也有显著性差异，骨下0 mm组和骨下1 mm组骨吸收最多，而骨下2、3 mm组骨吸收较少（P<0.05）。结论：多根牙即刻种植时，受植区牙槽骨宽度均减小，骨吸收主要发生在种植体颈部。从种植体颈部到根方，牙槽骨吸收逐渐减少；多根牙即刻种植深度以骨下2 mm为宜。

关键词: [关键词] 即刻种植, 骨吸收, 锥形束CT

Abstract: Objective:To study the changes of multiple roots teeth in alveolar bone morphology in the implant area after immediate implantation by different depth. Methods: 44 teeth were selected from 38 patients who had been implanted for the previous multiple roots teeth. The cases were implanted from different depth in the middle of multiple roots with bone grafts and was divided into 4 groups- 0,1,2,3 mm below the bone by height of cervical border of implant neck. The CBCT images were took for immediate plant and 6 months later, reconstruct the 3-D images of plantation area and measure alveolar ridge width (5 planes), alveolar ridge width in labial and buccal (4 planes),lingual and palatal side (4 planes) with Simplant software. The morphology of alveolar bone in the planted area was analyzed statistically after immediate planting. Results: The width morphology of alveolar bone in the planted area was (1.158 0.567) mm, (0.676 0.390) mm, (0.391 0.257) mm, (0.163 0.149) mm, (0.053 0.083) mm in 5 measurement plane between immediate plant and 6 months later (P<0.01). The width morphology of alveolar bone in buccal side was (0.701 0.382) mm, (0.436 0.274) mm, (0.274 0.178) mm, (0.121 0.115) mm in 4 measurement plane (P<0.01). The width morphology of alveolar bone in lingual or palatal side was (0.448 0.308) mm, (0.233 0.170) mm, (0.119 0.119) mm, (0.041 0.056) mm in 4 measurement plane (P<0.01). The width morphology was different significantly between immediate plant and 6 months by different planting depths, The bone absorption was highest in the subosseous 0 mm group and the subosseous 1 mm group, the subosseous 2 and 3 mm group had less bone absorption (P<0.05). Conclusions: The alveolar bone width of the implanted area all decreased when multiple roots teeth were implanted immediately, and bone absorption mainly occurred in the neck of the implant; from the neck of the implant to the root, the alveolar bone absorption becomes less and less. Implantation depth of immediate implantation of multiple roots teeth should be 2 mm below bone.

Key words: [Keywords] Immediate Implant , bone resorption, CBCT

钟飞陈宁顾红政朱镇江烨. 多根牙不同深度即刻种植后牙槽嵴骨形态变化的CBCT研究[J]. 口腔生物医学, 2021, 12(3): 185-189.

参考文献 28

[1]	Araujo MG, Mg, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alteration following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets:An experimental study in the dog [J] . J Clin Periodontol, 2005, (32) : 645- 652.
[2]	Becker W.Immediate implant placement: Treatment planning and surgical steps for successful outcomes[J]. Br Dent J,2006,201(4):199-205.
[3]	Block MS,Kent JN. Placement of endosseous implants into tooth extraction sites[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1991,49(12):1269-1276.
[4]	Novaes AB Jr, Novaes AB. Immediate implants placed into infected sites: A clinical report [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1995,10(5):609-613.
[5]	Naves Mde M, Horbylon BZ, Gomes Cde F,et al. Immediate implants placed into infected sockets: A case report with 3-year follow-up[J]. Braz Dent J,2009,20(3):254-258.
[6]	Douglass GL. Merin RL. The immediate dental implant[J]. J Calif Dent Assoc,2002,30(5):362-365,368-374.
[7]	Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: A formula for protection of the patient and clinician[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2004,19(5):731-734.
[8]	Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Br?nemark fixtures im type Ⅳ bone: A 5-year analysis[J]. J Perio-dontol,1991,62(1):2-4.
[9]	陈淑萍，周延民，李恩洪，等.美学区即刻种植牙槽嵴及唇侧骨壁宽度变化的CBCT研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志，2014,28(6) : 345-347.
[10]	赵丽萍，詹雅琳，胡文杰，等.不同测量方法评价磨牙拔牙位点保存术后牙槽骨的变化[J].北京大学学报（医学版），2016,48(1) : 126 -312．
[11]	Gracco A, Luca L, Cozzani M, et al. Assessment of palatal bone thickness in adults with cone beam computerized tomography [J]. Aust Orthod J. 2007,23: 109–113.
[12]	戊诚兴主编. 生物科学基础--口腔医学基础理论[M].长沙：湖南教育出版社，1993:551-553.
[13]	魏宁.拔牙创不同处理方式对其牙槽骨变化影响的比较[D].遵义市：遵义医学院，2009.
[14]	Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, et al. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes [J]. J Periodontol，1998，69（9）：1044-1049 .
[15]	Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, et al. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases [J]. J Periodontol，1997，68（6）：563-570 .
[16]	Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, et al. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res，2012,23（Suppl 5）?:39-66 .
[17]	钟飞，陈宁.后牙拔除后牙槽嵴骨形态变化的CBCT分析[J].口腔生物医学，2018,9(2)?: 91-94.
[18]	Babbush CA. Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sites[J]. Dent Implantol Update, 2006, 17(12): 89-93.
[19]	Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J．Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites[J]．J Clin Periodontal,2004,3l(10):820-828．
[20]	Schwartz-A rad D,Gulayev N，Chaushu G. Immediate versus non-immediate implantation for full-arch fixed reconstruction following extraction of all residual teeth: a retrospective comparative study[J]. J periodontal,2000,71:923-928.
[21]	Tsai ES, Crohin CC,Weber HP. A five-year evaluation of implants placed in extraction sockets[J]. West Soc Periodontol periodontal Abstr,2000,48:37-47.
[22]	Fugazzotto PA. Simplified technique for immediate implant insertion into extraction sockets：Report of technique and preliminary results [J]. Implant Dent, 2002, 11(1): 79-82.
[23]	Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1992,274:124-134.
[24]	Van Loven K, Jacobs R, Swinnen A, et al. Sensations and trigeminal somatosensory -evoked potentials elicited by electrical stimulation of endosseous oral implants in humans [J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2000, 45(12): 1083-1090.
[25]	Frost HM. Bone“mass”and the“mechanostat”：A proposal [J]. Anat Rec, 1987, 219(1): 1-9.
[26]	Romanos GE, Toh CG, Siar CH, et al. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading：An experimental study with Macaca fascicularis [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002, 17(1): 44-51.
[27]	Meyer U, Joos U, Mythili J, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants [J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(10): 1959-1967.
[28]	Brunski JB. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants[J]. Dent Implantol Update, 1993, 4(10): 77-81.