3D打印全程导板在口腔种植外科手术中的应用分析

口腔生物医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3): 160-164.

3D打印全程导板在口腔种植外科手术中的应用分析

钟飞,安玉林,朱镇,江烨,闫学敏,吴凤萍

镇江市口腔医院

收稿日期:2025-02-06 修回日期:2025-04-22 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-06-30
通讯作者: 钟飞 E-mail:zhongfei362121@163.com
基金资助:
2023 年度镇江市科技创新资金（重点研发计划——社会发展）项目

Application analysis in oral implant surgery by a 3D printed wholecourse guide plate

Received:2025-02-06 Revised:2025-04-22 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-06-30
Contact: Fei ZHONG E-mail:zhongfei362121@163.com
Supported by:
2023 Zhenjiang City Science and Technology Innovation Fund (Key Research and Development Program - Social Development) Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：分析3D打印全程导板辅助口腔种植手术的精准度，评价其在口腔种植中的作用。方法：选取镇江市口腔医院种植修复科在2021年3月至2022年3月期间的41例种植手术，共60颗牙，分成2组：3D打印全程导板种植组和常规种植组，每组各30颗牙。术前拍摄CBCT，2组均进行常规口扫，应用“Dentiq Guide种植导板软件”进行设计，导板组采用3D打印种植全程导板，常规组按照“Dentiq Guide种植导板软件”的设计位置进行常规种植手术。术后即刻拍摄CBCT，应用“Dentiq Guide种植导板软件”将术前、术后CBCT重叠，测量术前设计种植体与术后实际种植体位置，计算两者之间的位置差异，比较使用3D打印种植全程导板和常规种植准确度及术后反应。结果：2组在颊舌向角度、种植体颈部、根部近远中向误差差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.01)，导板组误差小于常规种植组；术后疼痛方面，导板组也明显轻于常规种植组(P＜0.01)；2组在近远中向角度误差及术后肿胀方面差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)，导板组小于常规种植组；而在种植体植入深度及种植体颈部、根部颊舌向误差差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：应用3D打印导板辅助种植手术，在手术精确度及术后反应方面均优于经验丰富种植医生的常规种植，能实现以修复为导向的精准种植。

关键词: 3D打印导板, 口腔种植, 锥形束计算机断层扫描

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the accuracy of 3D printed whole course guide plate assisted oral implant surgery, and evaluate its role in oral implantation. Methods: Forty-one cases involving 60 teeth of dental implant were selected. They were implanted between March 2021 and March 2022 in the dental implant department, and they were divided into two groups: Three dimensional printing whole guide plate planting group and free hand planting group. Each group involved 30 teeth. CBCT were taken preoperatively in all cases, and routine oral scans were carried out by using “Dentiq Guide software”. Implant operations were performed in the guide plate group, but routine implant surgery in the position designed by the software. CBCT were overlapped before and after operation by using “Dentiq Guide software”. The design implant position was measured before operation and the actual implant position was measured after operation. The location difference was calculated between the two groups, and the accuracy of 3D printed plate was compared with that of free hand implant surgery. Results: There were significant differences in the buccolingual angulation, implant neck, and apical mesiodistal error between the two groups (P<0.01). The error of the guide plate planting group was smaller than that of the free hand planting group; In terms of postoperative pain, the guide plate planting group was also significantly lighter than that of the free hand planting group(P<0.01); There are differences in the mesiodistal angulation error and postoperative swelling between the two groups (P<0.05); there were no statistically significant differences in the implant placement depth and the buccolingual error at the implant neck and root (P>0.05). Conclusions: The application of 3D printed guide plates in implant surgery is superior to the free hand planting of experienced planting doctors in terms of surgical accuracy and post response, and it can achieve precise planting oriented by restoration.

Key words: 3D printed guide template, Dental implant, CBCT

钟飞安玉林朱镇江烨闫学敏吴凤萍. 3D打印全程导板在口腔种植外科手术中的应用分析[J]. 口腔生物医学, 2025, 16(3): 160-164.

参考文献 26

[1]	Bahat O, Fontanesi RV, Preston J. Reconstruction of the hard and soft tissues for optimal placement of osseointegrated implants [J].Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1993, 13(3): 255-275.
[2]	任凌飞, 杨国利. 美学区种植修复后出现唇侧丰满度不佳的解决策略[J].口腔医学, 2019, 39(4): 346-349.
[3]	Edge M J. Surgical placement guide for use with osseointegrated implants[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1987,57(6):719-722.
[4]	Abboud M, Wahl G, Calvo-Guirado J L, et al. Application and success of two stereolithographic surgical guide systems for implant placement with immedicate loading[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012,27(3):634-643.
[5]	Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23 (Suppl 6): 124-135.
[6]	李晋蒙, 欧国敏. 计算机辅助设计种植导板精确性及其影响因素[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 93-98.
[7]	CONNERT T, WEIGER R, KRASTL G．Present status and fulure directions-Guided endodontics [J]. Int Endod J, 2022,10:995-1002.
[8]	HE W， TIAN K, XIE X, et al．Computer-aided autotransplantation of teeth with 3D printed surgical guides and arch bar: a preliminary experience [J]. Peer J，2018,6:e5939.
[9]	LIN H H， CHAO P G, TAI W C, et al．3D-printed collagenbaced waveform microfibrous scaffold for periodontal ligament reconstruction [J]. Int J Mol Sci，2021,22(14):7725.
[10]	MASPERO C， TARTAGLIA G M．3D printing of clear orthodontic aligners: where we are and where we are going [J]. Materials(Basel)，2020,13(22):5204.
[11]	LIANG S， XIE X, WANG F,et al．Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Glass Ⅲ malocclusion [J].Korean J orthod，2020,50(5):346-355.
	李承靖，方冬冬，杨文宇，等．手术导航技术下3D打印在颌面部骨折治疗中的应用分析［J］．中国医学装备，2021,18(9):100-102.
[12]	CHEN X, WANG Y, MAO Y，et al．Biomechanical evaluation of Chinese customized three-dimensionally printed total temporomandibular joint prostheses: a finite element analysis［J］． J Craniomaxillofac Surg，2018,46(9):1561-1568.
[13]	Shah P，Chong B S． 3D imaging，3D printing and 3D virtual planning in endodontics［J］． Clin Oral Invest，2018，22( 2) : 641-654．
[14]	Widmann G， Bale R J．Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review［J］． The International journal of oral ＆ Maxillofacial implants，2006,21(2):305-313.
[15]	Jacobs R．Reoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients［J］． Periodontology，2003,4(33):12-25.
[16]	陶江丰，陈宁，禅祖权，等．上颌前牙种植美学修复46颗的临床评价［J］．口腔医学，2010，30（11）：646-648.
[17]	陈振宇，潘颖菁．牙支持式3D打印种植导板在即刻种植中应用的临床效果观察［J］．中国医药科学，2020，10( 12) :232-235．
[18]	李二红，薛彬，秦育苗．3D 打印导板技术在牙列缺损患者中种植术及术后的精确性分析［J］．中国口腔种植学杂志，2020，25( 4) :155-157．
[19]	黄硕，郭芳，刘宁，等．3D打印个性化根形钛合金种植体在下颌磨牙区即刻种植的临床研究［J］．口腔医学研究，2021,37(7):602-606.
[20]	Sagheb K，Schiegnitz E，Moergel M，et al．Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized cad-cam-producedtitanium mesh［J］．Int J Implant Dent，2017,3(1):36.
[21]	Ackerman S, Aguilera FC, Buie JM, et al. Accuracy of 3 -dimensional-printed endodontic surgical guide: a human cadaver study [J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(5): 615-618.
[22]	张碧楚, 李杏, 戴丽霞. 上颌前牙美学区唇侧骨的锥形束 CT 分析 [J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2019, 35(4): 216-219.
[23]	Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29 (Suppl 16): 416-435.
[24]	Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, et al. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012, 14(4): 527-537.
[25]	Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, et al. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(2): 394-401.
[26]	李晋蒙, 欧国敏. 计算机辅助设计种植导板精确性及其影响因素 [J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1): 93-98.