| [1]Burns DR,Beck DA,Nelson SK.A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional ?xed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics[J].J Prosthet Dent,2003,90(5):474-497.[2]Ulker M,Ulker HE,Zortuk M,et al.Effects of Current Provisional Restoration Materials on the Viability of Fibroblasts[J].Eur J Dent,2009,3(2):114-119.[3]Kim SH,Watts DC.Degree of conversion of bis-acrylic based provisional crown and fixed parial denture materials[J].J Korean Acad Prosthodont,2008,46(6):639-643.[4] ISO 10993-5 (2009),Biological evaluation of medical devices –Part5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity,International Organization for Standardization[5]Jorge JH,Giampaolo ET,Machado AL,et al.Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: A literature review[J].J Prosthet Dent,2003,90(2):190-193.[6]Kedjarune U,Charoenworaluk N,Koontongkaew S.Release of methyl methacrylate from heat-cured and autopolymerized resins: Cytotoxicity testing related to residual monomer[J].Aust Dent J,1999,44(1):25-30.[7]Ulkera M,Ulkerb HE,Zortukc M,et al.Effects of Current Provisional Restoration Materials on the Viability of Fibroblasts[J].Eur J Dent,2009,3:114-119.[8]Bural C,Akta? E,Deniz G,et al.Effect of post-polymerization heat-treatments on degree of conversion,leaching residual MMA and in vitro cytotoxicity of autopolymerizing acrylic repair resin[J].Dent Mater,2011,27(11):1135-1143.[9]罗军,蔡春,吕春绪.微波有机合成化学最新进展[J].合成化学,2002,10(1):17-22. |
