›› 2018, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4): 206-209.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of two methods in mandibular impacted third molar extraction

  

  • Received:2018-08-27 Revised:2018-10-03 Online:2018-12-25 Published:2019-01-07

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effect of high speed turbine method and traditional bone chisel method in mandibular impacted third molar extraction. Methods: Eighty patients with bilaterally symmetrical middle and low mesioangular impaction mandibular third molars were randomly divided into high-speed turbine method and traditional bone chisel method. The operative time were recorded. The patients were followed up for 2 and 5 days after operation. The postoperative complications such as swelling, pain, limitation of mouth opening, dry socket, numbness of lower lip were recorded. Results: The average operation time of the high speed turbine group was (12.40±3.85)min, which was significantly lower than that of the traditional method group by (17.27±4.47) min (P<0.05). High speed turbine group was also superior to the traditional bone chisel method group in postoperative pain, swelling and limitation of mouth opening (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance between the two groups in postoperative bleeding, dry socket and the lower lip numbness (P>0.05). Conclusions: High-speed turbine method has the advantages of less trauma, shorter operative time and less complications.